The research / Selected human studies

Good light.
Real research.

From smoother-looking skin to recovery after exercise, light therapy is worth a closer look. Here are the findings that matter—and what they mean.

01 / Skin & collagen

A closer look at
smoother skin.

36%lower measured wrinkle roughness

In one controlled trial, the combined red + near-infrared group improved by 36% from baseline at the three-month follow-up.

633 + 830 nm · 8 sessions over 4 weeks
Group average versus baseline; not a Torch result.

Study details & sources

Lee et al., 2007. A randomized, sham-controlled, split-face trial assigned 112 adults to four groups; 76 completed the study. The 36% figure is the combined-light group's change in measured roughness at three months after treatment, not a reduction in wrinkle count or an effect measured against placebo.

Skin samples also showed increased collagen and elastic fibers. Many participants dropped out, and most were women aged 35–55, which limits how broadly the findings apply. The devices and treatment doses differ from this torch.

Read the original skin trial ↗

Another controlled trial, Wunsch & Matuschka, 2014, enrolled 136 volunteers and found improvements in skin roughness and ultrasound-measured collagen density after 30 sessions. It used broad-spectrum equipment and 23 non-randomized, untreated controls; the study had manufacturer involvement.

Read the collagen study ↗

02 / Acne

Encouraging findings.
Wavelengths matter.

8weeks in a red-light acne trial

A small split-face study reported fewer acne lesions on the red-light-treated side after eight weeks of treatment.

28 volunteers · Twice-daily treatment

The 2024 acne guideline found insufficient evidence to recommend light devices. Many trials also use blue light, which this torch does not have.

Study details & sources

Na & Suh, 2007. In a randomized split-face study, 28 volunteers used red light for 15 minutes twice daily for eight weeks. The treated side showed improvements in inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts. The comparison was an untreated side, not sham light.

Read the red-light acne trial ↗

The wider picture: the 2024 American Academy of Dermatology guideline found insufficient evidence to recommend laser and light devices for acne. Promising individual trials do not settle that question.

Read the acne guideline ↗

03 / Muscle recovery

Recovery, under
the microscope.

34randomized trials reviewed

A 2024 review found a small average improvement in strength recovery when light was applied before exercise.

Pre-exercise light therapy · Different devices and doses

Results varied, and the physically active subgroup did not show a significant benefit.

Study details & sources

2024 systematic review and meta-analysis. The review included 34 randomized trials and reported a small pooled effect of pre-exercise photobiomodulation on strength recovery: standardized mean difference 0.24 (95% confidence interval 0.10–0.39). This is a statistical effect size, not “24% better recovery.”

Read the muscle-recovery review ↗

A useful counterpoint: a placebo-controlled study of 12 men using 660/850 nm LEDs after sprint exercise found no significant advantage for soreness, jump performance or measured recovery biomarkers. Matching wavelengths alone does not establish the same results.

Read the 660/850 nm trial ↗

04 / Joint function

Movement deserves
attention, too.

Promising for function.

A 2025 umbrella review found moderate-certainty evidence for improved function in knee osteoarthritis.

An umbrella review brings multiple reviews together.
The knee-function finding concerns clinical light treatments.

Evidence for pain relief was weaker. This does not establish that the Torch treats arthritis, joint pain or inflammation.

Study details & sources

Son et al., 2025. The review covered 15 meta-analyses across many conditions. For knee osteoarthritis, it reported a moderate-certainty improvement in disability/function, with an equivalent standardized mean difference of 0.65 (95% confidence interval 0.14–1.15).

Its knee-pain finding was much smaller and supported by lower-certainty evidence. The authors called for better trials and standardized protocols. Results from professional light and laser devices cannot be transferred directly to a handheld consumer torch.

Read the umbrella review ↗

And where does
the Torch fit?

The Torch brings 630, 660 and 850 nm light into one portable device. Those specifications describe its light—not a clinical outcome. No clinical study of this specific torch is presented here.

Thryve Red Light Torch on dark stone
Three wavelengths / One button

Meet your
everyday torch.

Stainless steel. A travel-ready kit.
Ships from Texas.

Explore the Torch
Research reviewed September 2026